Clarity at the start.
Confidence in the work.
A focused question. A defined output. A clear record of how the work was done.
Explore this chapter
A defined piece of work.
A clear way to review it.
A first engagement could produce a landscape brief, evidence summary, or opportunity brief. Scope and review criteria would be agreed before work begins.
Scope
Agree the question, intended users, expected output, and what would make the work useful.
Plan
Set responsibilities, dependencies, review points, and a realistic sequence of work.
Prepare
Confirm source permissions, access, handling requirements, and the expertise needed.
Deliver
Develop and review the output. Make sources, assumptions, and unresolved questions visible.
Learn
Review the work against the agreed scope and decide what is worth doing next.
Make the work
easy to follow.
The proposed records connect the question, the sources, the judgment, and the next step.
Who owns the work
A work plan would identify the expected outputs, accountable owners, dependencies, review points, and acceptance criteria. Each item should connect to the question the work is intended to answer.
Where the information comes from
A source record would preserve origins, dates, permitted uses, and quality limitations. Access would be assigned for agreed purposes and removed when no longer needed.
How the output was reviewed
A review record would show who checked the output, how the evidence was interpreted, and which questions remain. Reported activity would be distinguished from demonstrated effectiveness.
What changed and why
Material changes, their rationale, and approval would be recorded. The work plan would identify who resolves issues, escalates risks, and responds to incidents.
What has been delivered
Reporting would distinguish completed work, next steps, and blockers. Administrative arrangements would cover appropriate approvals, financial oversight, records, and conflicts of interest for the work undertaken.
Demonstrate value.
Deepen the connections.
Each phase should establish a reason to proceed. Evidence, delivery capacity, and agreed safeguards guide the next step.
Establish the foundation
Align on priority questions, data permissions, governance, and the people needed to deliver.
Demonstrate practical value
Develop focused use cases, test analytical workflows, and refine outputs with participating institutions.
Deepen the connections
Expand participation and use cases where evidence, capacity, and agreed safeguards support it.
Decisions stay
with participants.
100Fold’s proposed role is to support information, introductions, and coordination.
The proposed initiative would not act as a pooled fund or payment intermediary. Donors would use their chosen giving arrangements; participating institutions would retain their own funding, approval, and due-diligence responsibilities.
Sharing one contribution would not open the rest of an institution’s records. Permitted uses, access, and information release would be agreed for the relevant work.
Measure the stages clearly.
An introduction, a commitment, and completed delivery are different things. Track them separately, show the supporting evidence, and describe 100Fold’s contribution precisely.
Start with
your question.
A useful initial conversation starts with four things. A concise description is enough to begin shaping the scope.
The question
What do you need to understand—and which decision should the answer inform?
The context
Which issue, geography, and time frame matter? Who is closest to the work?
The starting information
What relevant information is already available, and what could be shared with permission?
The useful output
Would a landscape brief, evidence summary, or set of potential introductions help you take the next step?
The purpose of the first conversation
Determine whether the question fits the proposed approach, what information and expertise it would require, and what a useful first piece of work could deliver. Scope, timing, responsibilities, and participation would then be agreed.